with the world on its way toward peak oil, in another 50 years do you think we will see companies like Ferrari and Dodge producing carbon fuel free sports cars and muscle cars, respectively? Or will these types of vehicles which guzzle carbon fuels pretty rapidly simply disappear?
I THINK THEY WILL HAVE THE SAME POWER BUT LIKE ELECTRICITY OR SOLAR POWER OR HYDROGEN
It all depends on the condition of the vehicle. Without seeing the car it is hard to even take a guess. A project car (one that needs restoration) could be worth anywhere from $100 to a couple of thousand dollars. A show condition all original car could be worth much more!!!
its considered to be a modern day muscle car,although it hasn’t been around that long its one of dodges strongest running cars,and fastest,for what it is and they way it comes from the factory its a very fast car,probably one of the few cars that will scare me when i ride in one,unless im driving now days anything that runs over 120 miles per hour kind of makes me wish i wasn’t in it,i have drove a few vipers that run really strong,the fastest i ever seen one doing was 134 and i was driving it,but yes its considered to be a modern day muscle car,most people think of muscle cars as being the older cars with the old v-8,s but a viper is good competition for any of these cars,good luck.
With the new Fast and Furious movie coming out in 2009, many are hyped about it. As some fans already know, the movie is going to contain both muscles and riced cars. So which will you pick if you got the chance to drive one, and why? Also, what car will you pick?
The New Fast and Furious (2009) Car pics,
http://www.fastandfurious4.co.uk/2007/09/14/fast-and-furious-4-movie-cars/
Muscle Car Definition
"Muscle car is a term used to refer to a variety of high performance automobiles. The term principally refers to American, Australian and to a lesser extent South African models. It generally describes a 2-door rear wheel drive mid-size car with a large, powerful V8 engine, and at an affordable price". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscle_car
American Muscle Cars
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2320/2174829323_0f8b88079f.jpg
http://www.supercars.dk/images/products/dodge-viper-sports-cars.jpg
American Rice Burner
http://memimage.cardomain.com/ride_images/2/4666/4821/24164910261_large.jpg
Italian Muscle Cars
http://www.allfordmustangs.com/articles/uploads/giugiaro_mustang1_500.jpg
http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b243/Nortad/terras%20maia/IMG_0184.jpg
Rice Burner Definition
"Rice burner is a pejorative used initially to describe Asian-made — particularly Japanese-made — motorcycles and automobiles. Many variations have also been used, such as rice rocket for Japanese sport bikes.
More contemporary use of the term rice burner, along with the prefix rice, has taken on an alternate pejorative meaning for an automobile that has been modified to give impression of high performance, but does not necessarily have any high-performance capabilities. This practise is in direct contrast to the ’stealth’ or ’sleeper’ style of automotive modification, where a vehicle may have major performance modifications, but the appearance remains similar to that of a stock model. In this manner, the appellation can apply to any vehicle regardless of country of origin". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rice_burner
Japanese Riced Car
http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f292/bilalkmazhar/Cars/2Fast2Furious-NissanSkyline.jpg
Japanese Muscle Car
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i166/f430spiderv8/Spyker%20C12/Nissan%20GT%20R/nissan_gt_r_proto_2005_01.jpg
you dont drive rice, you eat it
this should explain everything
http://i153.photobucket.com/albums/s220/Crime_Mob_2007/ricer.jpg
So within a couple of years I was thinking of buying a 1966-1970 Dodge Charger (preferably a 1968,70). It would be a long working progress since I wouldn’t have enough money to buy one in fairly good condition for $10,000 or so. So odds are in this car there probably won’t be an engine nor a transmission. And if not, I was wondering, do to money, if I should get a 440 instead of a HEMI. Later on when I am way older, I want to buy a Dodge Dart anyway, and hopefully I will have money so that when I am restoring that Dodge Dart, I can buy a HEMI. And with that I was thinking about switching the 440 to the Dart and putting in the HEMI into the Charger. I want both of these cars to have a manual transmission. I was also wondering, if the Charger didn’t have an engine or trans, would it even matter what color it is despite what the VIN says? I would to prefer to have a black, blue, red, or maybe even green Charger but obviously there is no guarantee I will get one that color if I find a good deal. Finally, what are your thoughts about adding a turbo or a supercharger to my Charger? Thank you and I appreciate serious answers.
I have recently found a 1970 Dodge Charger 500 (no engine, old auto trans) on eBay motors starting at $4000. It has so much rust though and it needs work on every panel. I was thinking of sending him an email if he will take it for a lower price. It is suppose to be Jamaican Blue according to the VIN, which looks so nice. What do you think?
if you wait any longer to find one that isn’t restored you may be out of luck on finding one,the fact that those are one of the most desired cars out there right now is making them almost impossible to find and even if you do it wont be cheap,if you do find one go with a good 440 engine in it because they are the best for those cars,good luck.
What do you think of my list:
1. 1964 Ford Fairlane Thunderbolt
2. 1973 AMC Javelin AMX
3. 1969 Dodge Charger
4. 1968 Plymouth Road Runner
5. 1969 Plymouth Road Runner Superbird
6. 1969 Chevrolet Camaro
7. 1969 Dodge Super Bee
8. 1969 Dodge Charger Daytona
9. 1971 Chevrolet Nova
10. 1969 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
The Impala and El Camino definatly deserve a place on my list!
1963 Pontiac Tempest Lemans 421 Super Duty, 2X4 barrel factory, 326 cid Badged – first factory Super Sleeper, Arnie Beswick blew away the debut of the new 1964 Ford Fairlane 500 Thunderbolts 427s and new 1964 Dodge 426 HEMI cars, with his Wife’s 1963 Pontiac Tempest 4-door Station Wagon, "Mrs. B’s Grocery Getter". Also Paul Goldsmith in a 1963 Pontiac Lemans Tempest 421 Super Duty beat everyone by OVER FIVE MILES in a GT Race at Daytona Speed Weeks, Challenge Cup 250, February 16, 1963, (a Ray Nichels Pontiac). Second place A.J. Foyt, 1963 Chevrolet Corvette, 3rd Place Bill Krause in a 1963 Mickey Thompson Chev. Corvette 427, and also beat by over 5 miles, 1963 Cobras, last two years defending champ(Ferrari GTO) the new 1963 Ferrari 250 GTO, and who ever else showed up! the Ferrari 250 GTO was capable of 0-60mph in 5.8 seconds, top speed of 174 MPH, the 1963 Chev. Corvette 427 top speed of 180 MPH, the 1963 Pontiac Tempest Lemans 421 S.D. averaged 145 MPH, and won by over FIVE MILES, who said Pontiac never made a car that could handle turns?! Also The "Running Bear", Anderson Pontiac (Knafel ), 1963 Pontiac Tempest Lemans 421 S.D., the Protoype with Pontiac engineers, for the new 1964 Pontiac GTO, "Running Bear" did the 1/4 mile in 11.89 @ 123.28MPH! In 1961 Pontiac made history when Hayden Proffit blew everyone away in a Factory 1961 Pontiac Catalina 421 S.D. with a 1/4 mile in 12.55 seconds @ 110.20 MPH, first factory car under 13 seconds, first car in the 12s, in the World! 1962 Jim Wangers 1/4 mile in 12.38 @ 116 MPH in a 1962 Pontiac Catalina 421 Super Duty, factory! Therefore the Greatest Muscle Car, and First True Muscle Car was the 1964 Pontiac GTO!
alright should i drop a 360 or a 340 in it? 360 obviously because of the power. but 340 because of gas mileage and i could still fit my A/C unit in it. i live in florida so air conditioning is definately a plus but im stuck deciding. any advice or options would be great. thanks.
Personally… I would go with the 340…
The 340 was the Dart "hot-rod". The 360 (to my knowledge) was never offered as a factory engine. I like to see things left as they were originally built, or at least as close to that as possible.
Just a personal opinion. I love the old Darts… Had a buddy with a 69 Swinger with a 340… it was real quick…
Good luck and I’m sure you will enjoy the car regardless of your choice of engines…
My favorite cars are 2008 dodge challenger and a 1970 chevelle ss 454 why dont muscle cars turn?
If your talking about the handling characteristics, muscle cars are generally midsized cars with full sized engines installed – a Tempest, for instance, with a Bonneville engine becomes a GTO – a Mustang with a Galaxy engine becomes a Cobra Jet and so on.
This is a recipe for a quick trip down the drag strip but not so much an understeering, rear end sliding quick trip around a slalom course.
Sports cars, on the other hand, are generally engineered for handling.
Im looking for any bad ass american muscle example: the camaro ss 1969 or the dodge charger fun stuff like that
Try: http://www.autotraderclassics.com/ they might have something listed in your neck on the woods. If not you can always hire a transport company.
Im trying to figure out how they make the big muscle cars like dodge charger fast, and the lightweight hondas like the civic type R, only inline 4s. Do smaller engines have capability of having more torque, or more hp? which one, im trying to clear this up.
Thanks!
The bigger the engine the better.
It makes more power.
But, an engine that’s twice as big with the same number of cylinders is not twice as powerful.
It has double the torque but to achieve double the power it would need to rev at the same rpm as the smaller capacity engine.
It can’t do that because it has bigger and heavier parts.
But if you have a 1000cc 4 cylinder engine you can take two of these, put them together and get an 8 cylinder 2000cc engine with both twice the torque and power.
You increase the rpm as much as technology will allow.
Past that, if you want more power you have two choices:
1)Bigger capacity engine (more cc).
2)Same capacity engine with more cylinders (revs higher thus gives more power).
The engines you mention are not comparable.
The Honda is not just a small and high reving engine, it’s also much more advanced technologically.
They gave it the power they wanted to give it taking into account size, weight, fuel emissions, cost etc.
They could have got more power easily from a bigger and heavier engine if they wanted to.
Big engines compromise the handling, US cars are renowned for their torque and bad handling.
The Type-R is one of the best handling cars ever made.
So what do you want to do, drive from A to B or DRIVE?
what happened to settlers of jamestown?
plymouth?
in Jamestown they ate that bad weed and only that Dare girl survived
In plymouth it was way worse, Increase and Cotton Mather and outlawing sex and booze so they all died off I think